Information for Districts, Campuses, and Charter Schools with Areas of Need Identified through the 2014 State Accountability System

Word version

The purpose of this correspondence is to provide information regarding requirements under Texas Education Code (TEC) §39 and resources available from the Texas Education Agency (TEA or agency), which are designed to support districts, campuses, and/or charter schools in their improvement efforts.  To meet our state’s shared goal of improving student performance, TEA collaborates with local education service centers (ESCs) and the Texas Center for District and School Support (TCDSS) to assist districts, campuses, and/or charter schools in addressing areas of need identified through the state accountability system.  Intervention requirements and resources are provided through the framework of the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS), which includes the continuous improvement process of data analysis, needs assessment, improvement planning, and implementation and monitoring of a plan for improvement.

On August 1, 2014, state accountability data was provided to districts, campuses, and charter schools by TEA’s Division of Performance Reporting via the accountability application within the Texas Education Agency Secure Environment (TEASE), and on August 8, 2014, state accountability data and ratings were released publicly. 

Identification for Interventions

The state accountability system includes the performance index framework and system safeguard measures, which are explained in detail in the 2014 Accountability Manual.  Engagement in the TAIS continuous improvement process is required if the district, campus, or charter school:

  • Received the rating of Improvement Required (IR) due to failing to meet the target on one or more of the performance indexes; or
  • Failed to meet the performance target for one or more system safeguards.

Campuses are also required to continue engaging in the TAIS continuous improvement process if the campus is identified as:

  • Formerly Improvement Required (FIR) due to receiving an IR rating in 2013 and receiving a rating of Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard in 2014, or
  • A priority or focus school under the USDE flexibility waiver.

Statute specifies graduated interventions and sanctions for districts, campuses, and charter schools based on the number of years identified for low performance in the state accountability rating system.  Under requirements of TEC §39.116, for purposes of determining multiple years of low performance and required interventions and sanctions, the performance ratings issued in 2011 and 2013 are considered consecutive.  For example, if a district, campus, or charter school was rated Academically Unacceptable in 2011 and IR in 2013 and 2014, it will participate in 3rd Year IR interventions.

Intervention Requirements

Requirements for All Campuses Rated Improvement Required (IR)

Title 19 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) §97.1063 and TEC §39.106 stipulate that a campus intervention team (CIT) shall be assigned to a campus when it is rated IR in the state accountability system.  A campus identified as IR needs to: 

  • Identify members of the campus intervention team (CIT) which is composed of the:
  • Identify members of the campus leadership team (CLT);
  • Submit names of the PSP and DCSI for approval by September 5, 2014
  • Submit DCSI qualifications to TEA through ISAM by September 26; and 
  • Send required staff to TAIS training
    • For campuses rated 1st year IR, the DCSI and principal are required to attend training at their local ESC.
    • For multi-year IR campuses (2nd year and higher), the DCSI is required to attend, and principal is encouraged to attend, a regional training led by TEA and TCDSS.
    • TCDSS will send a follow-up email with detailed information about trainings and how to register, including specific information around training requirements for IR campuses also identified as priority schools.

Collaboratively, the CIT and CLT will perform the intervention duties reflected in statute, which include engaging in the TAIS continuous improvement process, evidenced by a targeted improvement plan and quarterly progress reports submitted to the agency.

The PSP:

  • Provides on-site technical assistance and support to build the capacity of campus leaders, teachers, and school staff to understand TAIS,
  • Serves as a liaison between TCDSS, TEA, ESC, and district/charter school,
  • Is an approved member of the PSP Network,
    • A registry of qualified PSPs available in each region may be accessed via ISAM application within TEASE.
  • Supports implementation of all campus intervention requirements, and
  • Reports progress to the agency.

The DCSI is a district-level employee who:

  • Ensures district support for the academic achievement of the campus and implementation of all intervention requirements;
  • Is in a leadership position in school improvement, curriculum and instruction, or in another position with responsibility for student performance;
  • Has a direct line of contact to the superintendent and other critical district personnel; and
  • Has the authority and influence to encourage operational flexibility and eliminate potential barriers to continuous
    improvement efforts.

In larger districts with several campuses rated IR, the DCSI may be supplemented by employees with similar skills and expertise serving as members of a district support team; these persons may be recommended for service on the CIT in lieu of the DCSI.

The CLT consists of key campus leaders responsible for:

  • Development, implementation, and monitoring of the targeted improvement plan,
  • Monitoring student performance, and
  • Determination of student interventions and support services.

Districts should carefully review the job descriptions found at each link above before identifying and proposing a PSP and DCSI and prior to establishing the CLT.  After carefully reviewing the job descriptions for the PSP and DCSI and communicating with the regional ESC turnaround team regarding the selection process, the district or charter school may submit names of the recommended DCSI and PSP for each IR campus to TEA for approval.  Districts/charter schools are encouraged to use their regional ESC as a resource for guidance in identifying and recommending a PSP and DCSI and for submitting the names through ISAM.  TEA and/or the TCDSS will notify the district of final determinations regarding assignment of the PSP and DCSI.

In accordance with TEC, additional interventions and/or sanctions are required for campuses that have been identified for low performance for multiple years.  For additional information on intervention activities and campus actions please see the Campus-Level Accountability Interventions flowchart.  Additionally, a letter with more detailed information for each IR year designation will be sent in the coming weeks.

Requirements for Campuses Rated Formerly Improvement Required (FIR)

Campuses are designated as FIR because they received an IR rating in 2013 and a Met Standard rating in 2014.  According to TEC §39.106(e)(1)(A), the CIT is required to continue its work with the campus until it meets performance standards for two consecutive years, unless the CIT is released as stipulated in TEC §39.106(e)(1)(B).  Therefore, FIR campuses will fully engage in the TAIS continuous improvement process, including working with the CIT and submitting a targeted improvement plan and quarterly progress reports to the agency.  The FIR designation will be noted in ISAM, and TEA will separately notify districts/charter schools with campuses that are eligible for a CIT release waiver.

Requirements for All Districts Rated Improvement Required

Intervention requirements differ for districts and charter schools with a single campus (single-campus districts) and for districts and charter schools with more than one campus (multi-campus districts).  Single-campus districts will implement the interventions required for an IR campus as noted in the section above, while multi-campus districts will engage in the district-level interventions described in this section.

Districts that are rated IR in 2014 must determine who will serve as the DCSI, and who will serve on the district leadership team (DLT).  Districts and charter schools should carefully review the job descriptions found at each link above before identifying the DCSI and establishing the DLT.  Districts need to submit the name of the DCSI to TEA for approval by creating or updating the DCSI’s profile in the contacts tab of ISAM by September 5, 2014.  Additionally, DCSI qualifications need to be submitted through ISAM by September 26, 2014.  DCSIs are required to attend TAIS training, and as aforementioned, TCDSS will send a follow-up email with detailed information about training and how to register.

The DCSI and DLT will collaboratively engage in the TAIS continuous improvement process and submit the resulting targeted improvement plan and quarterly progress reports to the agency.  For additional information on intervention activities and district/charter school actions please see the District-Level Accountability Interventions flowchart

Intervention Requirements for all Campuses, Districts, and Charter Schools rated Met Standard that Failed to Meet One or More System Safeguard Measures

Districts, campuses, and charter schools rated Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard that failed to meet one or more system safeguard measures are required to utilize the DLT/CLT to engage in the TAIS continuous improvement process to address the system safeguard(s) missed.  Districts and campuses should include intervention activities that are designed to address the missed system safeguard(s) in their TEC §11 improvement plans.  Although no submissions or progress reporting are specified at this time, TEA may request the submission of the district or campus TEC §11 plan that contains these intervention activities. 

Additional Intervention Systems and Requirements

Federal Accountability System 

The State of Texas secured a conditional waiver on September 30, 2013, from the U.S. Department of Education for specific provisions of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), commonly known as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001.  As outlined in the waiver, designated Title I campuses are identified as a priority or focus school.  Additional information about identification, required interventions, and supports for these campuses can be found at ​  

Performance-Based Monitoring (PBM) System

Districts and charter schools have received Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) reports, and additional communication will be sent in early October when staging information is available.  Districts and charter schools staged for PBM interventions will be required to designate a DCSI and establish a DLT.  The DCSI and DLT will engage in
the TAIS continuous improvement process and will develop strategies and interventions in the district’s targeted improvement plan that address the low performance identified in the PBMAS reports.

We encourage you to work closely with your regional ESC, for technical assistance, resources, and guidance regarding the intervention requirements, assistance in the determination of the DCSI, PSP, and membership of the leadership teams, and training for all stakeholders.

Additional information about state accountability intervention requirements and resources are found on the Program Monitoring and Interventions (PMI) website at  Templates are being updated, so please be sure to access 2014-2015 intervention process documents, which will be available on the website in late August.  District, campus, and charter school designations and 2014-2015 resources will be updated in ISAM in mid-September.  You can also receive email updates by joining the PMI listserv.  If you have further questions, you may contact the Division of Program Monitoring and Interventions via email at or via phone at (512) 463-5226.


Sally Partridge
Associate Commissioner
Accreditation and School Improvement